Ambivalent
by Ela Harrison Gordon
Before I became a rawfoodist, extra-dark chocolate was one of my power foods. I enjoyed the fact that I could eat a very small amount of it and be satisfied for a long time. I started eating cooked foods again shortly after I got together with my husband two years ago. The very first non raw item I ate was a little piece of 100% cocoa chocolate when we were out in the back-country with very little food, no stove and foul weather. At this point I had been avoiding raw cacao for many months because of the skin irritation. I have never experienced the skin irritation with non-raw chocolate: however, I have sometimes experienced the appetite stimulation - most notably one time when I made a raw brownie recipe but used non-raw 100% chocolate because I didn't have any raw cacao on hand, and otherwise the few times that I've made the mistake of eating chocolate that's less than 80% cacao. This all leaves me highly ambivalent about chocolate, whether it's better raw or not raw. The issue of rancid omega-6 becoming trans fats, which I just came across yesterday, is a clincher for me if it's true, though: I'm currently trying to figure out whether the omega-6 is present in any quantity (I know that cacao butter is mostly saturated fat, don't know whether this might protect the omega-6 if the ratio is big enough, etc). But I have heard some people say that raw cacao is more potentially harmful too... I also wonder whether the skin irritation I had wasn't specific to something about the powdered form: I don't think I ever got it from nibs or beans. I have just bought some raw nibs and am going to experiment, probably keeping the quantities very small and avoiding the crazy appetite stimulation from mixing with sweets.
Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? |
Enjoy This Site?
Then why not use the button below, to add us to your favorite bookmarking service? | |
ServicesHow ToInspirationAdd Your VoiceNatural Remedies | ||
|
| ||